<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wall Street Journal: Cavalier about corrections?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediabugs.org/blog/2010/05/25/the-wall-street-journal-cavalier-about-corrections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediabugs.org/blog/2010/05/25/the-wall-street-journal-cavalier-about-corrections/</link>
	<description>Fix the news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 03:33:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Yoo&#8217;s bin Laden conspiracy theory â€” MediaBugs Blog</title>
		<link>http://mediabugs.org/blog/2010/05/25/the-wall-street-journal-cavalier-about-corrections/comment-page-1/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Yoo&#8217;s bin Laden conspiracy theory â€” MediaBugs Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 22:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabugs.org/blog/?p=136#comment-479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] We agree. The question is, does the Wall Street Journal? We may not get an answer to that; thus far the Journal has been unresponsive to inquiries about Yoo&#8217;s piece, and its newsroom has proven inaccessible on such matters in prior cases. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] We agree. The question is, does the Wall Street Journal? We may not get an answer to that; thus far the Journal has been unresponsive to inquiries about Yoo&#8217;s piece, and its newsroom has proven inaccessible on such matters in prior cases. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Yoo&#8217;s bin Laden conspiracy theory &#171; Mark Follman</title>
		<link>http://mediabugs.org/blog/2010/05/25/the-wall-street-journal-cavalier-about-corrections/comment-page-1/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Yoo&#8217;s bin Laden conspiracy theory &#171; Mark Follman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 22:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabugs.org/blog/?p=136#comment-478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] We agree. The question is, does the Wall Street Journal? We may not get an answer to that; thus far the Journal has been unresponsive to inquiries about Yoo&#8217;s piece, and its newsroom has proven inaccessible on such matters in prior cases. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] We agree. The question is, does the Wall Street Journal? We may not get an answer to that; thus far the Journal has been unresponsive to inquiries about Yoo&#8217;s piece, and its newsroom has proven inaccessible on such matters in prior cases. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wall Street Journal pushes flimsy Obama story, then stonewalls &#171; Mark Follman</title>
		<link>http://mediabugs.org/blog/2010/05/25/the-wall-street-journal-cavalier-about-corrections/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal pushes flimsy Obama story, then stonewalls &#171; Mark Follman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabugs.org/blog/?p=136#comment-292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] isn&#8217;t the first time we&#8217;ve encountered a void when trying to reach the Journal about an error report. And while the previous instance involved a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] isn&#8217;t the first time we&#8217;ve encountered a void when trying to reach the Journal about an error report. And while the previous instance involved a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wall Street Journal runs unsupported Obama-shakeup story, then stonewalls questions â€” MediaBugs Blog</title>
		<link>http://mediabugs.org/blog/2010/05/25/the-wall-street-journal-cavalier-about-corrections/comment-page-1/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal runs unsupported Obama-shakeup story, then stonewalls questions â€” MediaBugs Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabugs.org/blog/?p=136#comment-283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] isn&#8217;t the first time we&#8217;ve encountered a void when trying to reach the Journal about an error report. And while the previous instance involved a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] isn&#8217;t the first time we&#8217;ve encountered a void when trying to reach the Journal about an error report. And while the previous instance involved a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bureau Chiefs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cheers and Regards for the Week of May 31, 2010</title>
		<link>http://mediabugs.org/blog/2010/05/25/the-wall-street-journal-cavalier-about-corrections/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Bureau Chiefs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cheers and Regards for the Week of May 31, 2010]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 04:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabugs.org/blog/?p=136#comment-232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of paper somewhere that guaranteed such a thing. (DL)  REGARDS to the Wall Street Journal, which is apparently busy doing whatever else it is doing to issue simple corrections to name misspellings in book reviews. Or to respond to someone pointing [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of paper somewhere that guaranteed such a thing. (DL)  REGARDS to the Wall Street Journal, which is apparently busy doing whatever else it is doing to issue simple corrections to name misspellings in book reviews. Or to respond to someone pointing [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenberg&#39;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Wall Street Journal: Cavalier about corrections?</title>
		<link>http://mediabugs.org/blog/2010/05/25/the-wall-street-journal-cavalier-about-corrections/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Rosenberg&#39;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Wall Street Journal: Cavalier about corrections?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 17:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabugs.org/blog/?p=136#comment-93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] [Crossposted at the MediaBugs blog] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] [Crossposted at the MediaBugs blog] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
