<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wall Street Journal runs unsupported Obama-shakeup story, then stonewalls questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediabugs.org/blog/2010/11/10/wall-street-journal-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediabugs.org/blog/2010/11/10/wall-street-journal-obama/</link>
	<description>Fix the news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 03:33:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Endless quest for a fix at CNN â€” MediaBugs Blog</title>
		<link>http://mediabugs.org/blog/2010/11/10/wall-street-journal-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-3964</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Endless quest for a fix at CNN â€” MediaBugs Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 03:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediabugs.org/blog/?p=189#comment-3964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The point of slogging through this tale isn&#8217;t to pick on CNN, but rather to illuminate an endemic problem. CNN.com is hardly alone in its inaccessibility and unresponsiveness, as MediaBugs&#8217; recently published national survey of news sites reveals. We&#8217;ve had similar experiences reporting errors via MediaBugs with Fox News, the LA Daily News, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The point of slogging through this tale isn&#8217;t to pick on CNN, but rather to illuminate an endemic problem. CNN.com is hardly alone in its inaccessibility and unresponsiveness, as MediaBugs&#8217; recently published national survey of news sites reveals. We&#8217;ve had similar experiences reporting errors via MediaBugs with Fox News, the LA Daily News, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Yoo&#8217;s faulty Bin Laden conspiracy theory â€” MediaBugs Blog</title>
		<link>http://mediabugs.org/blog/2010/11/10/wall-street-journal-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Yoo&#8217;s faulty Bin Laden conspiracy theory â€” MediaBugs Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 23:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediabugs.org/blog/?p=189#comment-480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] thus far the Journal has been unresponsive to inquiries about Yoo&#8217;s piece, and its newsroom has proven inaccessible on such matters in prior [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] thus far the Journal has been unresponsive to inquiries about Yoo&#8217;s piece, and its newsroom has proven inaccessible on such matters in prior [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Yoo&#8217;s bin Laden conspiracy theory &#171; Mark Follman</title>
		<link>http://mediabugs.org/blog/2010/11/10/wall-street-journal-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Yoo&#8217;s bin Laden conspiracy theory &#171; Mark Follman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 22:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediabugs.org/blog/?p=189#comment-477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] thus far the Journal has been unresponsive to inquiries about Yoo&#8217;s piece, and its newsroom has proven inaccessible on such matters in prior [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] thus far the Journal has been unresponsive to inquiries about Yoo&#8217;s piece, and its newsroom has proven inaccessible on such matters in prior [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The White House shakeup that wasn&#8217;t: A followup on a Wall Street Journal mediabug â€” Scott Rosenberg&#039;s Wordyard</title>
		<link>http://mediabugs.org/blog/2010/11/10/wall-street-journal-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The White House shakeup that wasn&#8217;t: A followup on a Wall Street Journal mediabug â€” Scott Rosenberg&#039;s Wordyard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 14:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediabugs.org/blog/?p=189#comment-403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] some effort on MediaBugs&#8217; part, we received a response from the Journal&#8217;s assistant managing editor [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] some effort on MediaBugs&#8217; part, we received a response from the Journal&#8217;s assistant managing editor [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Endless quest for a fix at CNN &#171; Mark Follman</title>
		<link>http://mediabugs.org/blog/2010/11/10/wall-street-journal-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Endless quest for a fix at CNN &#171; Mark Follman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediabugs.org/blog/?p=189#comment-381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The point of slogging through this tale isn&#8217;t to pick on CNN, but rather to illuminate an endemic problem. CNN.com is hardly alone in its inaccessibility and unresponsiveness, as MediaBugs&#8217; recently published national survey of news sites reveals. We&#8217;ve had similar experiences reporting errors via MediaBugs with Fox News, the LA Daily News, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The point of slogging through this tale isn&#8217;t to pick on CNN, but rather to illuminate an endemic problem. CNN.com is hardly alone in its inaccessibility and unresponsiveness, as MediaBugs&#8217; recently published national survey of news sites reveals. We&#8217;ve had similar experiences reporting errors via MediaBugs with Fox News, the LA Daily News, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSJ&#8217;s Obama-shakeup overreach: Why I think the paper&#8217;s wrong, and why it matters â€” Scott Rosenberg&#039;s Wordyard</title>
		<link>http://mediabugs.org/blog/2010/11/10/wall-street-journal-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WSJ&#8217;s Obama-shakeup overreach: Why I think the paper&#8217;s wrong, and why it matters â€” Scott Rosenberg&#039;s Wordyard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediabugs.org/blog/?p=189#comment-303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] his inner circle. We sought a response from the Journal, and when we didn&#8217;t get one, we made a little noise about [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] his inner circle. We sought a response from the Journal, and when we didn&#8217;t get one, we made a little noise about [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Follman</title>
		<link>http://mediabugs.org/blog/2010/11/10/wall-street-journal-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Follman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediabugs.org/blog/?p=189#comment-290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Footloose - Thanks for your comment. As detailed in the the error report itself (see the comments section, via the first link in this post) we tried several different avenues in seeking a response from the Journal&#039;s newsroom. (Robert Thomson was not one of them.) That&#039;s a key issue here: the Journal isn&#039;t very accessible, it seems, when it comes to reporting an error. The designated email and phone info it provides apparently isn&#039;t very useful. And aside from that, there is no indication of who specifically to contact or who might be in charge of handling the matter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Footloose &#8211; Thanks for your comment. As detailed in the the error report itself (see the comments section, via the first link in this post) we tried several different avenues in seeking a response from the Journal&#8217;s newsroom. (Robert Thomson was not one of them.) That&#8217;s a key issue here: the Journal isn&#8217;t very accessible, it seems, when it comes to reporting an error. The designated email and phone info it provides apparently isn&#8217;t very useful. And aside from that, there is no indication of who specifically to contact or who might be in charge of handling the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Footloose</title>
		<link>http://mediabugs.org/blog/2010/11/10/wall-street-journal-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Footloose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediabugs.org/blog/?p=189#comment-288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Say, if you&#039;re looking for some WSJ response, isn&#039;t Alix Freedman your best bet? At one time, she was &quot;standards editor.&quot; Also a &quot;deputy managing editor.&quot; She might still have those titles. Not sure.

Sounds like you&#039;ve been trying to get a comment from Robert Thomson, the managing editor. He&#039;s a very busy man. It&#039;s hard to imagine him creating time in his schedule to help with this sort of story dissection by an outside party. Not what he does.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say, if you&#8217;re looking for some WSJ response, isn&#8217;t Alix Freedman your best bet? At one time, she was &#8220;standards editor.&#8221; Also a &#8220;deputy managing editor.&#8221; She might still have those titles. Not sure.</p>
<p>Sounds like you&#8217;ve been trying to get a comment from Robert Thomson, the managing editor. He&#8217;s a very busy man. It&#8217;s hard to imagine him creating time in his schedule to help with this sort of story dissection by an outside party. Not what he does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wall Street Journal pushes trumped-up Obama shakeup story, stonewalls questions â€” Scott Rosenberg&#039;s Wordyard</title>
		<link>http://mediabugs.org/blog/2010/11/10/wall-street-journal-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal pushes trumped-up Obama shakeup story, stonewalls questions â€” Scott Rosenberg&#039;s Wordyard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediabugs.org/blog/?p=189#comment-284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] has been working this one, but with no response from the Journal to date. A blog post by my colleague Mark Follman explains the situation:  Just ahead of last week&#8217;s election the Wall Street Journal reported [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] has been working this one, but with no response from the Journal to date. A blog post by my colleague Mark Follman explains the situation:  Just ahead of last week&#8217;s election the Wall Street Journal reported [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
