<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Activity on Description of light bulb in electrocution story raises questions</title>
      <link>http://mediabugs.org</link>
      <description>Activity on Description of light bulb in electrocution story raises questions</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2012 MediaBugs</copyright>
      <generator>RSS 2.0 generation class</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      <item>
         <title>Status Change</title>
         <link>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/dubious-description-of-light-bulb-in-electrocution-story#111</link>
         <description>Status Changed: Open</description>
         <author>Louise Frock&lt;http://mediabugs.org/people/Louise_Frock&gt;</author>
         <guid>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/dubious-description-of-light-bulb-in-electrocution-story#111</guid>
         <pubDate>2010-04-20T08:33:15-07:00</pubDate>
         <source url="http://mediabugs.org">MediaBugs</source>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>New Comment</title>
         <link>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/dubious-description-of-light-bulb-in-electrocution-story#116</link>
         <description>Richard P. Gabriel said: There are 8ft fluorescent lamps, and one can imagine a fixture holding, say, 4 of them in a 2x2 configuration for a total of 16ft or so. 

In ads for such lamps, voltage is a common specification (120 volts versus 220 volts) for the fixture / ballast at least. Voltage refers to voltage, and amperage refers to current.</description>
         <author>Richard P. Gabriel&lt;http://mediabugs.org/people/Richard_P._Gabriel&gt;</author>
         <guid>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/dubious-description-of-light-bulb-in-electrocution-story#116</guid>
         <pubDate>2010-04-21T11:35:21-07:00</pubDate>
         <source url="http://mediabugs.org">MediaBugs</source>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Status Change</title>
         <link>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/dubious-description-of-light-bulb-in-electrocution-story#117</link>
         <description>Status Changed: Open: under discussion</description>
         <author>Richard P. Gabriel&lt;http://mediabugs.org/people/Richard_P._Gabriel&gt;</author>
         <guid>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/dubious-description-of-light-bulb-in-electrocution-story#117</guid>
         <pubDate>2010-04-21T11:35:21-07:00</pubDate>
         <source url="http://mediabugs.org">MediaBugs</source>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>New Comment</title>
         <link>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/dubious-description-of-light-bulb-in-electrocution-story#127</link>
         <description>Scott Rosenberg said: We got a response from Vlae Kershner, news director at SFGate:

&quot;The reporter believes the story to be a correct transcription of what the police stated.&quot;</description>
         <author>Scott Rosenberg&lt;http://mediabugs.org/people/Scott_Rosenberg&gt;</author>
         <guid>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/dubious-description-of-light-bulb-in-electrocution-story#127</guid>
         <pubDate>2010-04-26T08:12:13-07:00</pubDate>
         <source url="http://mediabugs.org">MediaBugs</source>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Status Change</title>
         <link>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/dubious-description-of-light-bulb-in-electrocution-story#128</link>
         <description>Status Changed: Open: responded to</description>
         <author>Scott Rosenberg&lt;http://mediabugs.org/people/Scott_Rosenberg&gt;</author>
         <guid>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/dubious-description-of-light-bulb-in-electrocution-story#128</guid>
         <pubDate>2010-04-26T08:12:32-07:00</pubDate>
         <source url="http://mediabugs.org">MediaBugs</source>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>New Comment</title>
         <link>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/dubious-description-of-light-bulb-in-electrocution-story#159</link>
         <description>Louise Frock said: &quot;The reporter believes the story to be a correct transcription of what the police stated.&quot;

Interesting response. Does this mean the SF Chronicle is content simply with transcribing the statement of a public official and not vetting or verifying its contents?  Even after questions are raised by the public about its contents? In this case we&apos;re talking about the circumstances of an accidental death. Seems like that could be considered important. How does a guy get electrocuted by a kind of light fixture that may not actually exist?
</description>
         <author>Louise Frock&lt;http://mediabugs.org/people/Louise_Frock&gt;</author>
         <guid>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/dubious-description-of-light-bulb-in-electrocution-story#159</guid>
         <pubDate>2010-05-05T08:39:26-07:00</pubDate>
         <source url="http://mediabugs.org">MediaBugs</source>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Status Change</title>
         <link>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/dubious-description-of-light-bulb-in-electrocution-story#5512</link>
         <description>Status Changed: Closed: unresolved</description>
         <author>admin&lt;http://mediabugs.org/people/admin&gt;</author>
         <guid>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/dubious-description-of-light-bulb-in-electrocution-story#5512</guid>
         <pubDate>2010-06-21T09:00:41-07:00</pubDate>
         <source url="http://mediabugs.org">MediaBugs</source>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
