<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Activity on WSJ seems to invent story about an Obama shakeup</title>
      <link>http://mediabugs.org</link>
      <description>Activity on WSJ seems to invent story about an Obama shakeup</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2012 MediaBugs</copyright>
      <generator>RSS 2.0 generation class</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      <item>
         <title>Status Change</title>
         <link>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/wsj-seems-to-invent-story-about-an-obama-shakeup#54553</link>
         <description>Status Changed: Open</description>
         <author>Anonymous&lt;http://mediabugs.org/people/Anonymous&gt;</author>
         <guid>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/wsj-seems-to-invent-story-about-an-obama-shakeup#54553</guid>
         <pubDate>2010-11-02T09:35:04-07:00</pubDate>
         <source url="http://mediabugs.org">MediaBugs</source>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>New Comment</title>
         <link>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/wsj-seems-to-invent-story-about-an-obama-shakeup#54556</link>
         <description>Mark Follman said: We have emailed the lead reporter on the story, Peter Wallsten, seeking a response. </description>
         <author>Mark Follman&lt;http://mediabugs.org/people/Mark_Follman&gt;</author>
         <guid>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/wsj-seems-to-invent-story-about-an-obama-shakeup#54556</guid>
         <pubDate>2010-11-02T11:20:47-07:00</pubDate>
         <source url="http://mediabugs.org">MediaBugs</source>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Status Change</title>
         <link>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/wsj-seems-to-invent-story-about-an-obama-shakeup#54557</link>
         <description>Status Changed: Open: under discussion</description>
         <author>Mark Follman&lt;http://mediabugs.org/people/Mark_Follman&gt;</author>
         <guid>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/wsj-seems-to-invent-story-about-an-obama-shakeup#54557</guid>
         <pubDate>2010-11-02T11:20:47-07:00</pubDate>
         <source url="http://mediabugs.org">MediaBugs</source>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>New Comment</title>
         <link>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/wsj-seems-to-invent-story-about-an-obama-shakeup#54582</link>
         <description>Louise Frock said: The journal&apos;s main election story today repeats the same claim also without any evidence to back it up-

&quot;Even before the votes were counted, Democrats were pointing fingers over whom to blame for the drubbing. Some are calling for major changes in the tight circle of political advisers Mr. Obama keeps in the White House.&quot;

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703506904575591691212513522.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLETopStories


</description>
         <author>Louise Frock&lt;http://mediabugs.org/people/Louise_Frock&gt;</author>
         <guid>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/wsj-seems-to-invent-story-about-an-obama-shakeup#54582</guid>
         <pubDate>2010-11-03T03:18:55-07:00</pubDate>
         <source url="http://mediabugs.org">MediaBugs</source>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>New Comment</title>
         <link>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/wsj-seems-to-invent-story-about-an-obama-shakeup#54583</link>
         <description>Mark Follman said: This afternoon we also emailed WSJ.com managing editor Kevin Delaney seeking a response. </description>
         <author>Mark Follman&lt;http://mediabugs.org/people/Mark_Follman&gt;</author>
         <guid>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/wsj-seems-to-invent-story-about-an-obama-shakeup#54583</guid>
         <pubDate>2010-11-03T03:48:56-07:00</pubDate>
         <source url="http://mediabugs.org">MediaBugs</source>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>New Comment</title>
         <link>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/wsj-seems-to-invent-story-about-an-obama-shakeup#55531</link>
         <description>Mark Follman said: Despite several more attempts to contact the Journal, we&apos;ve gotten no response to date &#xe2;&#x80;&#x94; for further details read my blog post from today: 

http://mediabugs.org/blog/2010/11/10/wall-street-journal-obama/</description>
         <author>Mark Follman&lt;http://mediabugs.org/people/Mark_Follman&gt;</author>
         <guid>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/wsj-seems-to-invent-story-about-an-obama-shakeup#55531</guid>
         <pubDate>2010-11-10T03:18:43-08:00</pubDate>
         <source url="http://mediabugs.org">MediaBugs</source>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>New Comment</title>
         <link>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/wsj-seems-to-invent-story-about-an-obama-shakeup#55753</link>
         <description>Mark Follman said: This afternoon we received this response from Karen Pensiero, assistant managing editor at the Journal:

&quot;We fundamentally disagree with your assessment that our article &apos;Pressure Builds on Obama to Shake Up Inner Circle&apos; was &apos;unsupported.&apos; In fact, we were surprised that you took seriously the &apos;fabrication&apos; claim by your anonymous contributor. As is clearly stated in our article, our premise came from &apos;interviews with Ms. (Dee Dee) Myers and other strategists in touch with the White House.&apos; Those strategists told us that they &apos;expect more pressure for a complete West Wing overhaul,&apos; as we clearly stated in the article. Not surprisingly, many of those high-level officials aren&apos;t comfortable with making those calls in public. But nonetheless, our reporting for this article was solid and complete. The remainder of the article laid out the reasons why pressure was building for a shake up in the White House inner circle. Please be assured that the Journal takes matters of fairness and accuracy very seriously. However, in this case we disagree with the premise of your contributor&#xe2;&#x80;&#x99;s concern.&quot;
</description>
         <author>Mark Follman&lt;http://mediabugs.org/people/Mark_Follman&gt;</author>
         <guid>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/wsj-seems-to-invent-story-about-an-obama-shakeup#55753</guid>
         <pubDate>2010-11-11T05:09:16-08:00</pubDate>
         <source url="http://mediabugs.org">MediaBugs</source>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Status Change</title>
         <link>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/wsj-seems-to-invent-story-about-an-obama-shakeup#55754</link>
         <description>Status Changed: Open: responded to</description>
         <author>Mark Follman&lt;http://mediabugs.org/people/Mark_Follman&gt;</author>
         <guid>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/wsj-seems-to-invent-story-about-an-obama-shakeup#55754</guid>
         <pubDate>2010-11-11T05:10:15-08:00</pubDate>
         <source url="http://mediabugs.org">MediaBugs</source>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Status Change</title>
         <link>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/wsj-seems-to-invent-story-about-an-obama-shakeup#57464</link>
         <description>Status Changed: Closed: unresolved</description>
         <author>admin&lt;http://mediabugs.org/people/admin&gt;</author>
         <guid>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/wsj-seems-to-invent-story-about-an-obama-shakeup#57464</guid>
         <pubDate>2011-01-02T09:00:49-08:00</pubDate>
         <source url="http://mediabugs.org">MediaBugs</source>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Status Change</title>
         <link>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/wsj-seems-to-invent-story-about-an-obama-shakeup#57465</link>
         <description>Status Changed: Closed: unresolved</description>
         <author>admin&lt;http://mediabugs.org/people/admin&gt;</author>
         <guid>http://mediabugs.org/bugs/wsj-seems-to-invent-story-about-an-obama-shakeup#57465</guid>
         <pubDate>2011-01-02T09:00:49-08:00</pubDate>
         <source url="http://mediabugs.org">MediaBugs</source>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
